From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jun 16 13: 8:53 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0D05C37B580; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca43-44.ix.netcom.com [209.111.209.44])
	by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02923;
	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id NAA82680; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Reducing lengh of INSTALLS_SHLIBS variable
References: <394A34B7.6662A44A@FreeBSD.org>
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
In-Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:07:51 +0300"
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6
Date: 16 Jun 2000 13:08:34 -0700
Message-ID: <vqcg0qd75j1.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 8
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 > You're probably right.  I'll change it to INSTALL_SHLIBS (like my
 > message said ;).

On second thought, let's call it INSTALLS_SHLIB.  INSTALL_* sounds too
much like the other INSTALL_* macros.  (And most of the ports only
installs one shlib anyway.)

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message