From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 9 16:29:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3274D170; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [212.247.52.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A5AE81; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vnode.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9877AE3F07A; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:29:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vnode.se Received: from mail.vnode.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ylhf8KM87skr; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:29:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from devbox.vnode.local (unknown [83.223.1.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03553E3F079; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:29:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:29:22 +0100 From: Joel Dahl To: Attilio Rao Subject: Re: svn commit: r248097 - in head: . lib/libncp lib/libprocstat share/examples/nwclient sys/fs/nwfs sys/modules/ncp sys/modules/nwfs sys/netncp usr.bin/ncplist usr.bin/ncplogin usr.sbin/mount_nwfs Message-ID: <20130309162921.GL17537@devbox.vnode.local> References: <201303091245.r29Cjbr3054004@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:29:27 -0000 On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:17:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Robert Watson wrote: > > Hi Attilio: > > > > It's really great to see the continued progress towards the goal > > entirely-MPSAFE VFS in 10.x -- we owe you a huge vote of thanks for pursuing > > this! > > Thanks for the kind words. > > The VFS can be considered completely MPSAFE by date, the only > remaining thing to do is sweeping out smbfs/netsmb. > However a known FreeBSD shops has patches to make smbfs MPSAFE and I'd > rather give them more time to commit them and re-add smbfs as a MPSAFE > filesystem rather than get into their way and remove the support. Have they given you any ETA for this? 10.0 is approaching ... :-) -- Joel