From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 10 12:44:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7586FCDE for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8B77AE for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 12:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id F25B765AAF6 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-237-146.41-151.net24.it [151.41.146.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r4ACifvU013026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4ACiXTL035796; Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <518CEBB1.50109@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:33 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130507 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bf1783@gmail.com Subject: Re: ports/119546 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 12:44:52 -0000 On 05/10/13 14:32, b.f. wrote: >> Would I screw too many things if I tried adding: >>> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes > > Yes, because then the additions to the check-depends target in > ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk would cause unsandboxed builds of the port on > a live system to fail when security/openssl is installed. Adding > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE to port Makefiles should be avoided for this reason. Thanks for the answer, but I don't quite get this. Do you have any pointer for docs I can study? What's the purpose/usefulness of WITH_OPENSSL_BASE, then? Is there another simple solution? bye & Thanks av. P.S. Not only ssh fails, but Thunderbird too, if I enable nss_ldap.