From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 16:43:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090FB106567F for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A088FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1O6nsb-0000pU-Jn; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:43:25 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1O6nsb-0001I1-Iv; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:43:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:43:25 +0100 Message-Id: To: uqs@spoerlein.net In-Reply-To: <20100414163352.GS85798@acme.spoerlein.net> From: Pete French Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any chance of someone commiting the patch in bin/131861 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:43:37 -0000 > Well, the following header didn't work: > Cc: , > > Postfix will re-write this as part of sanitization, so I had to revert > to creating mbox files by hand. Anyway, could you please test the > following patch with a wider variety of mails? Sorry for not getting around to this util now - am testing the patch as my daily work email client at the moment to see how it does. Looks OK to me, though I'd like to spend more time thinking about it in relation to RFC822 and see if I can think of any places it might spclit what should be a valid address. cheers, -pete.