From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 01:30:13 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A10E1065672
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFD38FC1B
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219393F129;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0H1UBCM024020;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:11 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:37:52 EST."
	<F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1-A42CF4263B9E@siliconlandmark.com> 
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:11 +0000
Message-ID: <24019.1232155811@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Lcdproc] LCDProc CVS + PicoLCD on FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:30:13 -0000

In message <F2B6C026-25FB-4789-A2C1-A42CF4263B9E@siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Gu
ibert de Bruet writes:

>>>> ...but... they *are* HID devices.  Why is this "unfortunate"?
>>
>> It's unfortunate, because they are HID devices only because that
>> is what microchip.com supplies as a USB programming example.
>>
>> The actual protocol they talk has nothing to do with the HID
>> specification.
>
>PHK - I see that you committed the quirk for the 2X20. Would you mind  
>committing the patch attached to PR usb/128803? Do you want me to  
>produce the bits required for usb2 as well?

USB2 patches should go to HPS@ still I think ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.