From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 01:24:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED94316A4CE; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:24:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [65.173.111.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7A843D2D; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:24:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAI1O623015432; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:24:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id iAI1O6rv015429; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:24:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:24:06 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <419BB117.4070802@root.org> Message-ID: <20041117181754.W12541@wonkity.com> References: <20041115211636.GA1540@laptop.6bone.nl> <419AF4E7.5000206@wanadoo.fr><419B194E.5090800@DeepCore.dk> <419BB117.4070802@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:24:06 -0700 (MST) cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Please test: new ACPI release (20041105) import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:24:18 -0000 On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Nate Lawson wrote: > I'd love it if more people would help with debugging. I'm sure you can > relate to maintaining a subsystem where behavior is widely divergent even > among the same model device, OEM bugs are rampant and undocumented, and you > don't have access to a system that can repeat the behavior that the submitter > is reporting. Is there a test suite or procedure for what to test to verify ACPI function? Put something like that on the FLCL web site, and you may have more help than you want. 8-) http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA