Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:40:07 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libtextcat vs libexttextcat Message-ID: <20120513144007.GD16273@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <4FAD4BAB.10507@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FAD4BAB.10507@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le ven 11 mai 12 =E0 19:26:03 +0200, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> =E9crivait=A0: >=20 > These two ports either need to learn to co-exist (not overwrite each othe= r's > files) or to be marked as mutually conflicting (right now libtextcat does= n't have > a check). > First options would be preferable of course. Thanks for the notice! I was unaware of libexttextcat... For immediate safeness, I've just registered the confict in libtextcat. In a 2nd time, I guess that we could rename one of the createfp: this is just a tool to create fingerprints, and we mostly use only the libraries. What does office@ think? Best regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+vx8cACgkQc95pjMcUBaKkHACg8mtG+VxWcGElfBGty5htRBdO Q0kAn2rb1YBeMFF54/UgFKIPsFhausSN =UPpL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120513144007.GD16273>