From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 21 19: 3:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.mich.com (mercury.mich.com [64.79.64.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559CB37B5F9; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 19:03:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm002-033.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.80.81]) by mercury.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07991; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:02:37 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B124197E; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:01:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:01:02 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk feature requiest [patch] Message-ID: <20000721220102.C36849@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <3972E25C.7CDA3E2C@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 05:36:12PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 05:36:12PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > What do people think about this one? Looks fine to me. Can't be used where people keep a centralized ports system and WRKDIRPREFIX set to different locations on separate systems, though (should warn about that). -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message