From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 22 18:06:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD8106564A for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AAD8FC12 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaver.home.critical.ch (80-218-148-45.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.218.148.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id o6MI6cGn055144; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:06:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:06:35 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: RW Message-Id: <20100722200635.7f54c356.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100722183537.5382b6d5@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20100722121731.34b47a2a.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20100722183537.5382b6d5@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE defined by google search result X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:06:40 -0000 RW wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:17:31 +0200 > Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > > Usually when I find that a port can't fetch the according distfile I > > simply google for the distfile with the following search string > > (e.g. for rsync): > > > > intitle:"index of" rsync-3.0.7.tar.gz > > > > This approach almost always delivers plenty of results. I then > > manually download one of the results into my DISTDIR and restart the > > normal build process > > How often do you actually do this? Whenever I have a problem with a > distfile it's normally a rerolled file that's been propagated to all > mirrors. Unfortunately, recently much more often. Especially with non default OPTIONS that pull in additional patches/distfiles. Emanuel