Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:16:13 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Can't build ports on older FreeBSD machine Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.2.20050419211326.05bc1dc0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050420025823.GA55427@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200504180758.BAA10753@lariat.org> <20050419031952.GA90643@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050418213725.0591beb0@localhost> <20050419041638.GA56099@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050418222126.04ea4660@localhost> <20050419043330.GA92736@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050419203347.05bed918@localhost> <20050420025823.GA55427@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:58 PM 4/19/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >Those users of FreeBSD who care about supporting the ports collection >in a given configuration, do so. They don't just send mails >complaining that someone else should do it for them. What are you talking about? The maintainer of each port DOES support it for everyone else. That's the point of having port maintainers. However, the conventions for maintenance of ports should include support for all non-EOLed versions of FreeBSD. >P.S. You've ignored my Reply-To for a second time. Are you trying to >be deliberately aggravating, or does it just come naturally to you? My e-mail client has been honoring your "Reply-to" field correctly. You'll note that the "To:" fields on my replies all point to the list. --Brett Glass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.1.2.2.20050419211326.05bc1dc0>