From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec  7 23:11:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA07575
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 23:11:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA07561;
          Sun, 7 Dec 1997 23:11:25 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00375;
	Mon, 8 Dec 1997 17:36:10 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199712080706.RAA00375@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: VM system info 
In-reply-to: Your message of "08 Dec 1997 01:43:59 BST."
             <867m9gpsts.fsf@bitbox.follo.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 17:36:08 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I want this info in the kernel.  At the very least, I want
> documentation as a part of the SYSCTL_*() macro parameters, unused but 
> available as a (mandatory) part of the source - better would be as a
> part of the kernel that can be compiled away by setting a kernel
> option (e.g. NO_SYSCTL_DOCS).

Would you buy it in /usr/share/misc/sysctl_nodes?  I was thinking about 
that when I saved John's message...

mike