From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 07:27:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB95FC5 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 07:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [78.47.75.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8CE1678 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 07:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3fGRhw6ZjdzFTB2; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 08:27:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from winston.madpilot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZjL20jFcnqGx; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 08:27:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 08:27:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52ECA1ED.5030205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 08:27:41 +0100 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nano , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libiconv on 10.0-RELEASE References: <52EC99E0.2080801@bsdbox.co> <52EC9C3D.6060505@FreeBSD.org> <52EC9ED4.6030604@bsdbox.co> In-Reply-To: <52EC9ED4.6030604@bsdbox.co> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 07:27:46 -0000 On 02/01/14 08:14, nano wrote: > On 1/02/2014 6:03 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 02/01/14 07:53, nano wrote: >>> Seems to be some issues with it: >>> https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44644 >>> https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44659 >>> >>> And my problem: >>> https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44658 >>> >>> Can't do UPDATING: 20130904, libiconv has never been on the system. >>> >>> Not sure whether to allow portmaster to upgrade[*]. Pretty sure >>> something will break if I do. What do you suggest? >> >> Hi, >> >> Since then a new commit has changed things a little, it's r341775 [1] >> >> It now allows libiconv to be installed by a few selected ports who >> really need functionality not available in the base implementation of >> iconv. >> >>> >>> >>> [*] >>> # portmaster -adwv >>> ===>>> All >> (4) >>> >>> ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: >>> Upgrade php55-iconv-5.5.8 to php55-iconv-5.5.8_1 >>> Install converters/libiconv >>> Upgrade nginx-1.4.4_2,1 to nginx-1.4.4_3,1 >>> Upgrade owncloud-6.0.0a to owncloud-6.0.1 >>> >>> ===>>> Proceed? y/n [y] n >>> >>> >> >> From what I see here I think you can allow it to do that without >> problems for now. I've seen two PRs stating problems with some ports. >> >> The PRs I've indicate that, after such a step, glib20 and exim fail to >> build. These problems need fixing at present. >> >> This applies only to ports compiled on the live system, if one is using >> poudriere or tinderbox they can build anyway(so binary packages have no >> problems), this happens because when using these software each port is >> compiled in a clean environment. >> >> [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=341775 >> > > Hi, Guido. Thanks for your response. > > Not sure about this users particular situation, except that it appears > they are experiencing some problems compiling libiconv [0]. Another user > seems to be experiencing problems (re)installing php5x-iconv, which has > rendered something broken [1]. This makes me reluctant to proceed with > my upgrades for fear that similar will occur. > > Also, I'm not usng svn, but portsnap; don't know if it matches r341775. > Don't know at what time you ran portsnap, but, portsnap simply tracks the subversion repository, it's just a little lagged but just by one hour at most, so you most probably have a ports tree post r341775. > I appreciate your advice, but I think I will wait before updating these > ports. Hopefully things get cleaned up a bit. I would not be happy if > something breaks. I understand. I still have not had a good look at r341775 and have only built ports affected by it in poudrirere, and using them as binary packages, which works fine. > > > [0] http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44644&p=248807#p248731 > [1] http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=44659#p248806 > I really don't know what's going on on these user's systems. The error logs they posted have to little backlog to have any idea about what's really causing the problem. For what' I've seen php53-iconv should work fine, but if it's vital to you, you should then wait a little. These problems require some time and trials to fix. Most of the time the problem are the ported software packaging systems which assume FreeBSD has no iconv implementation and expect to find libiconv, or are unable to cope with two iconv implementations being available at the same time. This requires coping with such problems one by one which requires a little time and can't be really managed by automated testing systems, since these problems show up only on live systems. -- Guido Falsi