From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 4 15:51:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA08421 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 15:51:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl (esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl [194.151.75.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA08416 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 15:51:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xaa@xaa.iae.nl) Received: from ariel.xaa.iae.nl (ariel.xaa.iae.nl [194.151.75.10]) by esmeralda.xaa.iae.nl (VMailer) with ESMTP id 7A5301E0; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 00:51:37 +0100 (MET) Received: by ariel.xaa.iae.nl (VMailer, from userid 1002) id 3B7DE3EAD; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 00:51:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 00:51:37 +0100 From: Mark Huizer To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Dummynet for 3.0? Message-ID: <19981205005136.D817@ariel.xaa.iae.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.10i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I understand the constraints you were working within. I believe the > correct approach to the problem would have been to leave 2.2 alone and > bring DUMMYNET/BRIDGE into -current. The benefits being: Ordinarily good and proper sentiments, but this issue came up after code freeze and this option was not open to Luigi. Is the option to add dummynet to 3.0 open now? Mark -- Mark Huizer - xaa@xaa.iae.nl - markh@win.tue.nl Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid back. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message