From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 20 17:17:48 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C5716A421
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 May 2007 17:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F58413C46C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 May 2007 17:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3682084;
	Sun, 20 May 2007 19:17:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0892083;
	Sun, 20 May 2007 19:17:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id A887C5096; Sun, 20 May 2007 19:17:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>
References: <20070520022722.1f5a0cda@kan.dnsalias.net>
	<200705201013.39171.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<20070520085627.1b7de382@kan.dnsalias.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:17:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20070520085627.1b7de382@kan.dnsalias.net> (Alexander Kabaev's
	message of "Sun\, 20 May 2007 08\:56\:27 -0400")
Message-ID: <86ps4vifd4.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Michiel Boland <michiel@boland.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, Larry@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL problems after GCC 4.2 upgrade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:17:48 -0000

Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> writes:
> Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
> > Why does it not break on compile/link time?
> That is extremely good question. GCC issues warning that the code will
> abort if execution ever reaches this point, but compiles the file
> anyway. I see no logical explanation for this behaviour. Interested
> parties can take this to GCC mailing lists.

The build would stop if -Werror were enabled.

Speaking of which, it is interesting to note the amount of warnings gcc
emits when building the toolchain...

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no