Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:18:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277332] dns/knot-resolver and dns/knot3 are mutually exclusive due to dns/knot3-lib Message-ID: <bug-277332-7788-JQzto0kMA1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-277332-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-277332-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277332 --- Comment #8 from Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> --- I tried your patches several times. And indeed the move of knot-lib entries to LDCONFIG makes a difference. But every time I finalize the port to be perfect, then the same problem re-occurs. And I can't put the finger to the cause (yet). So earlier this week I came to a solution which shares more values - to pre= vent double maintenance of the two ports. Then when I was comparing the pkg-plis= t, the only difference are the executables, which are of limited size anyway. = And the dependencies seem equal. And so I start to wonder wether it isn't smarter to simply make knot-resolv= er depend on knot3, and get rid of the knot3-lib port. Then for users who insists not wanting the daemon I theoretically could sim= ply add post-install rm commands, which would make my life and everybody elses a lot easier. Ahead of your previous reply I also was looking how to install everything as not-root, but I haven't tested what happens when kresd:kresd starts using t= he lib which is knot:knot It's on my radar. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277332-7788-JQzto0kMA1>