From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 3 17:50:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2636016A41F for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA6A43D5F for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:50:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k03HobiU018017; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:50:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k03HobEM018016; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:50:37 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601031750.k03HobEM018016@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: john.destefano@gmail.com (John DeStefano) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:50:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Yujin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 - Do i need both CD1 and CD2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:50:38 -0000 > > From: "FlashWebHost.com" : > > There is 5.4 to 6 upgrade also at > > > > http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-upgrade-5.4-to-6.0/ > > This would be a great resource, if it were sure to work. I am not > anxious to go from 5.4-STABLE to 6.0 (not until it goes stable), but I > tried to run through the preparatory steps as outlined on that page. > I ran into a few concerns with steps 2 and 4: Just a question here -- What do you mean until it goes stable? FreeBSD 6.0 is already at RELEASE which is beyond stable. So you have the terminology mangled or just the typing? ////jerry