From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 10:59:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB07106566B; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from gse-mta-27.emailfiltering.com (gse-mta-27-tx.emailfiltering.com [194.116.198.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA278FC13; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw5.york.ac.uk ([144.32.129.29]) by gse-mta-27.emailfiltering.com with emfmta (version 4.6.0.72) by TLS id 755780012 for kensmith@buffalo.edu; 700040513cd033fa; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:59:31 +0100 Received: from ury.york.ac.uk ([144.32.108.81]:51201) by mail-gw5.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz600-0001Hy-QQ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:59:28 +0100 Received: from gavin (helo=localhost) by ury.york.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz600-0001Gi-JR; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:59:28 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:59:28 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Ken Smith In-Reply-To: <1285297884.17619.17.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> Message-ID: References: <20100922222441.00002f27@unknown> <1285253887.95760.33.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <20100923.203143.19192035494300157.imp@bsdimp.com> <1285297884.17619.17.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Cc: bruce@cran.org.uk, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, avg@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: svn commit: r212964 - head/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:59:47 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Ken Smith wrote: > This is definitely one I don't have a strong enough opinion > on to fight over, I sympathize with both sides. If the > general consensus is mostly towards changing so be it. > I've got no way to tell what percentage of users would > have any clue what to do with the crash info versus users > who would be negatively impacted simply by the fact their > systems are generating stuff they're completely ignorant > of and will never touch. We could make /etc/rc.d/savecore (the script that runs crashinfo) also email root@ (or wherever the periodic output is set to go to) with a pointer to the output, and instuctions on what to do (either delete, or email it somewhere). The output isn't sanitised so we'd have to be careful here - we can't just suggest send-pr. Thanks, Gavin