From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 16 04:34:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA13981 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 04:34:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itesec.hsc.fr (root@itesec.hsc.fr [192.70.106.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA13970 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 04:34:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pb@hsc.fr) Received: from mars.hsc.fr (pb@mars.hsc.fr [192.70.106.44]) by itesec.hsc.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5/itesec-1.10-nospam) with ESMTP id NAA01279; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:33:39 +0100 (MET) Received: (from pb@localhost) by mars.hsc.fr (8.8.5/8.8.5/pb-19970301) id NAA12634; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:33:38 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980216133338.EI36420@mars.hsc.fr> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:33:38 +0100 From: Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr (Pierre Beyssac) To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), ccsanady@friley585.res.iastate.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CCD missing spl() call.. References: <20245.887530725@time.cdrom.com> <199802152353.QAA08927@usr01.primenet.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.59.1e Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199802152353.QAA08927@usr01.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Feb 15, 1998 23:53:53 +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Terry Lambert: > I would even be willing to live with the form filling-out, if > I could send the thing to the intended audience *and* the bitbucket > instead of just the bitbucket. 8-). The freebsd-bugs list is already there for that. With my (limited) experience though, I agree that patches sent with send-pr AND with an accompanying message to -current seem to get attention (and be committed) more than patches just sent with send-pr :-) -- Pierre.Beyssac@hsc.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message