Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:09:02 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches/ handling Message-ID: <20000607210902.G16247@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20000607114355.D82541@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 11:43:55AM -0700 References: <20000605184259.A21736@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000606210209.B20037@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000607095546.B979@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000607092808.B55616@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000607202253.C15229@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000607114355.D82541@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@FreeBSD.ORG): > > IMO, patches are more easy to maintain if they are separated into > > arch and _not_ #ifdef'd. It's _much_ cleaner and makes the work for > > porters more easy. > > I completely dissagree. Me too. I don't know what I was thinking. Of course you are correct. I was confused in some manner. Alex -- This is a FreeBSD advocacy ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000607210902.G16247>