From owner-freebsd-net Tue Apr 9 4:36:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from daydreamer.dk (213.237.14.128.adsl.ho.worldonline.dk [213.237.14.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0771C37B41E for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 41397 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 11:36:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dpws) (192.168.1.3) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 11:36:42 -0000 Message-ID: <00bd01c1dfba$c93724f0$0301a8c0@dpws> From: "Dennis Pedersen" To: , "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020408200151.01cac1f0@mail.drwilco.net> <007501c1df3f$326d92a0$0301a8c0@dpws> <3CB20A6D.3040704@isi.edu> <5.1.0.14.0.20020409123453.01d16880@mail.drwilco.net> Subject: Re: IPsec tunnel mode Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:36:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" > At 12:16 9-4-2002 +0200, Dennis Pedersen wrote: > >But uhm is there a 'simple' way of doing this? (as in just adding the IP of > >the other ends gif interface as destinatio in my routes? > >The setup today i an exact copy of (other IP's of course) > >www.freebsddiary.org/ipsec-tunnel.php > >This works just fine besides til problem with my routes, arcording to the > >draft IPIP is the solution. My Question is now how do i set up with an IPIP > >tunnel? > >On http://rr.sans.org/firewall/IPSec_VPN.php there is an example, from my > >point of view it looks kind of complicated. Can it be made any simpler? > >If this is the way to do it, can i run mutible natd on both my external > >interface and the virtual gif interface (the howto creates the gif tunnel > >and diverts all trafic into this tunnel with natd on both ends) and how? > >(because i can't really se how the ipfw add divert natd can tell the > >difference between te 2 sessions of natd) > > That 2nd example is actually quite straightforward. It's just rather extensive. Okai i'll try it then , thanx :) > > And yes you can use 2 nat daemons. The 'natd' in the ipfw divert rule is > just a port number. You can start a second nat on a different divert port, > and use that other portnumber in the ipfw divert rule. Uhm okai, but where do i see the port number for the 2 natd processes? , kan i specify it somewhere or? /Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message