From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 14:53:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E26F16A4CE; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:53:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3A04402D; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:52:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (cs242719-195.austin.rr.com [24.27.19.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABEF146AD; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:52:49 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3FCD1784.90605@lonesome.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:51:48 -0600 From: Mark Linimon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030713 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rhodes References: <20031202160640.1df85804.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031202160640.1df85804.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-www@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Round two of the front page structure changes... X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:53:19 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:53:19 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:53:19 -0000 I don't have too much of a problem with any of this, but now that I read over the live page, I think we've got the security advisories too far down the page. Suggestions? Also I might suggest switching the order of 'software' and 'platform support', since 'software' is the more general of the two. Perhaps 'platform support' should even be a subhead of 'software'? I'm just brainstorming here. I want to add, however, that "Development" looks pretty close to the Right Thing for me, and not just because part of it was my idea :-), it just "looks right" now. There's plenty of other work to do on this stuff IMHO. mcl