Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:21:16 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bart=C5=82omiej_Rutkowski?= <robak@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: David Naylor <dbn@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The mystery of the missing library. Message-ID: <CAGFrfxZ1fUd4WM8t4QCX%2BDdb%2BXY2TiRy5wQKtjP5wC90MgaA0A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150729060640.GL2072@kib.kiev.ua> References: <2883201.vcG9JJBxrl@dragon.local> <CAGFrfxZpCT962krwPdBDoWUyf8ZXXf32kQ1HLuOK=MOSfNWb=Q@mail.gmail.com> <2674365.uk0duFZDgI@dragon.local> <20150729060640.GL2072@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: > > On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote: > > > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian) > > doing > > > static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you > adjust > > > the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary? > > > > ``` > > # cd /usr/local/bin > > > > # rm pypy > > > > # ln ../pypy-2.6/bin/pypy > > > > # ls -l pypy > > -rwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 5152 Jul 28 22:10 pypy > > > > # pypy > > Shared object "libpypy-c.so" not found, required by "pypy" > > > > # `which pypy` > > Shared object "libpypy-c.so" not found, required by "pypy" > > ``` > > > > I had a look at Debian and they seem to have quite a large patchset > > applied to pypy. Perhaps they patch it to make it work? > > > > Based on the documentation from pypy it appears they think a symlink > > should work. > > There were relatively recent (as in, Feb 2015) changes to always resolve > symlinks for $ORIGIN expansion, using realpath. The changes are in HEAD > and in stable/10, also in all 10.2 BETAs and RC. > > What version of the userspace do you use ? If not the versions listed > above, try them. Hopefully, $ORIGIN starts behaving for you. > I personally was testing this on 10.1. While trying 10.2-RC versions might make it work, we still need to make the port usable for people on 9.x and 10.1... I've talked to pypy people, and they told me that dynamic linking is in fact preferred way to do it, so following the Debian's route isnt the way to go. Kind regards, Bartek Rutkowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFrfxZ1fUd4WM8t4QCX%2BDdb%2BXY2TiRy5wQKtjP5wC90MgaA0A>