Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:47:11 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>, "" <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <20030203184103.K16840@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030203163157.80901N-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030203163157.80901N-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > reasonable, expected, or acceptable. Obviously, this is subject to > interpretation and debate, but I'd ask that those passing judgement on > this action take into account that this was given long and hard > consideration, and that it was not a decision taken lightly or without > regret. the thing is, you have on the one side -core that wants him gone, and, from what I can see, non-core that doesn't want him gone ... considering how much of a beauraucracy this has become, maybe there should be some sort of referundum(sp?) on issues like this? Where the userbase has some sort of a say? It just seems that there are some pretty critical issues that are being handled, and its hurting both sides of the project ... the userbase by the loss of some serious players, and the core themselves by the flames thye are getting for the decisions ... :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030203184103.K16840>