Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:34 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim <ssw@neo.redjade.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about import mpd into base system? Message-ID: <20050302082734.GA25310@neo.redjade.org> In-Reply-To: <20050302081729.GA76106@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200503011650.j21GoI7o018125@peedub.jennejohn.org> <61202.1109698143@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050302081019.GA25222@neo.redjade.org> <20050302081729.GA76106@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:17:30AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:10:19PM +0900, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <200503011650.j21GoI7o018125@peedub.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn w > > > rites: > > > > > > > >Sangwoo Shim writes: > > > >> Mpd is likely to be used by FreeBSD (and might DFBSD) exclusively. So, how > > > >> about import mpd into the base tree? Is there any stopper to prevent mpd from > > > >> being included into the tree? > > > >> > > > > > > > >Why? /usr/sbin/ppp supports PPPoE just fine and is already in the base. > > > > > > They should be merged. > > > > > > mpd-netgraph has functionality missing in the ppp in the base system. > > > > Exactly my opinion. I'm glad to know you think like that! > > Hmm, I'm curious whether there is any commiter planning mpd import. > > He said 'merged', as in 'combined into one program instead of having > two (three, including pppd) separate ppp implementations that do > almost the same thing'. > > Kris Ah, now I'm stand corrected. I should study more English. (sigh) Thanks for clarification. Regards, Sangwoo Shim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050302082734.GA25310>