From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  2 16:33:06 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE32106564A;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2011 16:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
	[128.95.76.21])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D310D8FC14;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2011 16:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu
	[127.0.0.1])
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	pB2GX5i6074144; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:33:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id
	pB2GX4Hs074139; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:33:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:33:04 -0800
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20111202163304.GA43138@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <CADe0-4=DwzFj1NbJTeq3p92YGF_5yjhc-Yajn-hHNB_aca1k2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111202015133.GA4111@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<CADe0-4n2rXvoo4K+CHd-JBCHJ56OdTJTpzsF1r2X1yvcLt5CEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111202064132.GC88903@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<4ED8776F.9060301@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111202072349.GA89183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20111202083501.GA73959@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<CADe0-4nj=ZvfPrT=9=m9hQhsADn9--5VFoAxTncGasQQTZN=0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.OSX.1.10.1112020746330.91234@peregrin.orthanc.ca>
	<CADLo839bijqDr936BHrzfCX-OWuQN8WKAVzEBPnUiZ_jOTaX5w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADLo839bijqDr936BHrzfCX-OWuQN8WKAVzEBPnUiZ_jOTaX5w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>,
	Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net>
Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:33:06 -0000

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:23:40PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2011 15:57, "Lyndon Nerenberg" <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you choose not to profile your code, that's entirely your choice.
>> Breaking this functionality for everyone else who *does* make the effort to
>> profile their code is a non-starter.
> 
> Nothing is being broken here, just a default being changed.
> 
> Users make up a greater proportion of our userbase than developers, so
> sensible defaults for them are more appropriate, right?

Users don't run freebsd-current (unless they are willing to
accept the inherit risks/warts associated with it).

-- 
Steve