From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 18 17:44:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2145316A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:44:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32E643D4C
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:44:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EB01272DD4; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DF272DCB;
	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:44:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050218081633.K637@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
Message-ID: <20050218094150.T59283@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20050217140951.R637@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
	<20050218081633.K637@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ntpdate behavior changes between 4.x, 5.x and CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:44:41 -0000

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:

> > ntpd 4.2.0 + patch to suppress those messages, which was obtained from the
> > upstream code.
> >
> > So the answer is "Because the vendor put it there, and we hid it again in
> > -CURRENT."
>
> Are there any plans to MFC ntpd 4.2.0? If adapting the patch for RELENG_5
> (And 4.1.1a) would make the process any easier, could I get my mittens on
> it?

Merging is probably not doable due to interface changes in the library,
but you can certainly figure out how to adapt the patch.  You'll want to
coordinate with roberto@ on any changes since he's done the upstream
imports.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org