From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 27 23:57:26 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC7E16A41F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jondoor@udor.net)
Received: from mail.mercenarylabs.com (ns1.mercenarylabs.com [12.158.191.94])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED56D43D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jondoor@udor.net)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilson [12.158.191.94])
	by mail.mercenarylabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF912AD4A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:57:25 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <42E81F60.30100@udor.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:57:20 -0400
From: Jon Door <jondoor@udor.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20050728004611.A41682@cvs.imp.ch>	<20050727230415.GB7618@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
	<20050728014022.R41682@cvs.imp.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20050728014022.R41682@cvs.imp.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: dhclient sucks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jondoor@udor.net
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:26 -0000

Martin Blapp wrote:

>> If we can't get things under control soon, we can look at alternate
>> options.  IMO, using the port isn't really an option because it wouldn't
>> allow users to install, but worst case reviving your version of the ISC
>> code for 6.x might be feasiable.  I'd really like to avoid that route
>> though.
>
>
> Hmm, I don't know whats the best thing to do currently. But I think the
> option to use the old version after installing would make all users
> having problems happy (until they install a new box ;)
>
IMHO the unhappy users are the ones best suited and most invested in 
testing the new code, I would worry a simple knob might divert some of 
that testing. Then again it would be helpful for general productivity to 
be able to switch back and forth.