From owner-freebsd-doc Tue Feb 27 06:48:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA23187 for doc-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 06:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA23180 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 06:48:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jfieber@localhost) by fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA04526; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:48:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 09:48:07 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber X-Sender: jfieber@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu To: Devin Martin cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Format In-Reply-To: <3132D1CF.68C1@sound.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 27 Feb 1996, Devin Martin wrote: > You should really consider organizing the data into much larger chunks. > Jumping from page to page in order to print out the documentation is very > time-consuming. In addition, printing all the graphics and stuff at the There is a MUCH better way of printing it out, but requires latex at the moment. As far as node size, there is tremendous variability in how different authors treat sectioning, and the HTML generator uses sectioning to break up the document. Generally, I think there is too much use of sectioning, (which generates a zillion tiny HTML files) and in many cases and descriptive list should be used instead. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ============