From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 26 01:03:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1FE16A4DA for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7900743D49 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k6Q13ZGe082026 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:03:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:03:34 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060726010334.GB70646@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060726001010.GE29366@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060726001010.GE29366@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Subject: Re: fsck in the background X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:03:35 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 25), Michael P. Soulier said: > A while ago there was a power failure in my house, long enough to > wear down the UPS. I had to power-on my server when I got home > (crappy bios), and I noticed after I logged-in that fsck was running > non-interactively in the background. > > Question: If it finds problems that require administrator > intervention, how does it tell me if it's running in the background? It logs an error to syslog, and the next time you reboot it forces a foreground check so it can prompt you for instructions. > I like that it runs in the background, it's a 200M drive. Still, I'm > curious about this difference from Linux where I have to wait while > fsck runs. You should be using ext3 on Linux :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com