From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 08:30:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161891065673 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742898FC28 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q528UpPa040419; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:30:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q528UoeN040416; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:30:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:30:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Dennis Glatting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Oscar Hodgson Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:30:54 -0000 > I have another storage server named bd3 that has a RAIDz2 array of 2.5T > drives (11 of them, IIRC) but it is presently powered down for maintenance. seems you don't need performance at all if you use RAIDz1/2 and ZFS. unless "performance" for you means how fast 1GB file are read linearly.