From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 6 12:39:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from tinker.exit.com (exit-gw.power.net [207.151.46.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A18156FD for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:39:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime.exit.com [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01354 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:39:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA02514 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:39:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <200001062039.MAA02514@realtime.exit.com> Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th In-Reply-To: <200001062012.MAA61710@apollo.backplane.com> from Matthew Dillon at "Jan 6, 2000 12:12:01 pm" To: current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:39:06 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: frank@exit.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (Note: trimmed to just the -current list.) Matthew Dillon wrote: > On the other hand, there are *plenty* of things already in 4.0 that really > need to get out there and get a workout by a larger audience. > Delaying *them* is a big mistake. On the _other_ other hand (:-), having pccard ep0 broken in 4.0-RELEASE is a mistake, IMHO. At the very _least_, the 589D's should work, and it would be Really Nice if the 574BTs worked, too. Of course, no one should expect full cardbus support until 4.1 or 4.2, given Warner's work situation. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message