From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 25 01:32:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA17660 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA17653 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:32:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA04830; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:31:07 -0800 (PST) To: Luigi Rizzo cc: michael@nocal.com (Mike Stickney), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is the Final EOL Disposition of v2.2.8? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Jan 1999 07:11:00 +0100." <199901250611.HAA25863@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 01:31:06 -0800 Message-ID: <4826.917256666@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Well... i have conflicting opinions. On one side, apart from what > you call it this would be the 2.2.9 thing that i have always desired. > Had you communicated your intention to do such a thing much earlier, > i think we would have seen more bugfixes or activity on the -stable > tree, whereas the lack of a new release has demotivated lot of > people from doing that (maybe i am just speaking for myself here...). Hmmm, let me just clarify this a bit: I have no intention of making a 2.2.9 and never did. I'm talking about grabbing the latest 2.2 snapshot, a snapshot which only exists because nobody got around to switching the 2.2 snap server off after 2.2.8 came out and saw no reason to do so before the branch. Now that we have branched, an event which more normally happens coincidently with the last release candidate being made, this issue has come up. That's all. There were no prior intentions here to communicate as this is a pure spur-of-the-moment decision. :) > Bottom line: i'd say yes, a 2.2S CDROM is a very good idea, provided > it does not come out "tomorrow" so people have the time to work on it. Well, the 2.2 snaps have already ceased, though I suppose if somebody out there wants to roll a newer one and ftp it to me, that would be fine also. I've just rolled my 2.2-S machine over to 3.0S in preparation for a new series of releases, so you'll have to forgive me if my own focus has shifted entirely off of 2.2 and I was hoping to make this a lot simpler by using the final 2.2 SNAP. :) Aside from that, what do you feel you guys need time to work on? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message