From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 16:45:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997F71065677 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EB08FC1B for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m49Gj6dH010980 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 11:45:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200805091645.m49Gj6dH010980@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 11:45:06 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Questions from a Total samba Novice. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 16:45:07 -0000 Warren Block writes: >Some alternatives have been mentioned, but you might also consider >mount_smbfs(8). I hope I managed to thank each of you who responded as I feel like I know where I need to go next thanks to all the great suggestions. I would have had to enabled nfs client if using mount_smbfs, correct? When I built the system in question, I did not enable nfs capabilities and don't really want to if I can avoid doing so. It sounds like smbclient fits the bill for now, but thanks to all of you for making things more clear. It seems that /usr/ports/net/samba3 gives one a whole boatload of possibilities. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK Systems Engineer OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group