From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 00:06:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E6B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:06:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lexi.siliconlandmark.com (lexi.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A9B43D55 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from lexi.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j31060SN097703; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:06:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)j3105tid097700; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:06:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: lexi.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:05:55 -0500 (EST) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: "David D.W. Downey" In-Reply-To: <20050331133625.31905.qmail@webmail13.mesa1.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <20050331184646.S52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> References: <20050331133625.31905.qmail@webmail13.mesa1.secureserver.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-SL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SL-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.542, required 6, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.06, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: andy@siliconlandmark.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm impressed with 5.4-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:06:10 -0000 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > I am truly impressed with the speed increases across the board with > 5.4-PRERELEASE. > I currently run an ipfw + ipnat + quagga box that handles our local > network traffic as well as bgp peering for ipv6 blocks. > I don't usually go gaga over most operating systems, but I must say I'm > very happy with the prerelease. At work, we have our own success story with it. We migrated our busiest webservers via re-install, to 5.4-pre (From 4.x) with much success. In all, the operation took about an hour to get the machines back up and handling requests. During this time, traffic was redirected to a couple of spare 5.4-pre servers that we had racked for the occasion. The data volumes are still UFS1 at this point, but that migration will have to be for another time... It all went so well that I was asked several hours after everything was back online if the process had begun! :-) Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >