From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 29 07:49:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE0A16A4DD; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9742F43D55; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6T7nLZx071793; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k6T7nLsm071789; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200607290749.k6T7nLsm071789@freefall.freebsd.org> To: weiming96@hotmail.com, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: i386/100460: Maybe the 6.0 Release is not much more than the 5.3 Release on file system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:49:21 -0000 Synopsis: Maybe the 6.0 Release is not much more than the 5.3 Release on file system. State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 29 07:44:32 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: The 5.3 release does not have some of the improvements that were later made to 5.4 and 5.5. The 6.0 release is missing some improvements made in the 6.1 release. Kris Kenneway's tests, as presented at BSDCan, tended to indicate that the latest codebase in 6-STABLE was outperforming not only 5-STABLE but also 4-STABLE. Again, that was with the latest code as available at the time. In general issues like this should be discussed on freebsd-questions or freebsd-hackers. The PR database is best used to flag very specific bugs in very specific code. The PRs that are submitted with performance problems generally tend to get lost in the large quantity of the former. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100460