From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 09:16:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F78314AE41F for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9596715FF for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AC1BD14AE41E; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8991414AE41D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2875B715FB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676F71ACCF for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0P9GXwk083118 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0P9GXIL083106 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234576] hastd exits ungracefully Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd-bugzilla@prt.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:16:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234576 Paul Thornton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-bugzilla@prt.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Thornton --- I see exactly the same hastd issue on 12.0-RELEASE-p2, with hast directly on top of the drives (no partitions) - I don't think that specifically is your problem. HAST seems to be broken in some other way with 12.0 However, my setup is slightly complicated as I have a zpool using GELI devi= ces, running above HAST. I am currently doing some testing to reduce this to the simplest reproducible setup to remove everything else, and then turn up some debugging. What I've noted so far is: 1) All of the hastd worker threads die virtually simultaneously. 2) This doesn't appear happen immediately you start writing data, but a very short while afterwards (order of a few seconds). As a side note for anyone else reading, I had issues making HAST work relia= bly in my setup under 11 as well, but this was easier to track down and patch. = The high level problem I found there was that ggate_recv received more data than MAXPHYS and the "impossible" condition of ENOMEM happened (line 1264 of primary.c). After adding some logging here, I "fixed" this by setting gctl_length to MAXPHYS + 0x200 in both primary.c and secondary.c which stop= ped the problem; this isn't exactly elegant but it worked OK for me. The issue reported in this bug seems unrelated to that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=