From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jun 10 14: 5:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from bishopston.net (h24-68-200-91.cg.shawcable.net [24.68.200.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9AD37BD68 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:05:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jamie@bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by bishopston.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA74975 for FreeBSD-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 22:05:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 22:05:24 +0100 (BST) From: Jamie Jones Message-Id: <200006102105.WAA74975@bishopston.net> To: FreeBSD-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Power to Serve England In-Reply-To: <20000610210115.J46015@netlink.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > england.* - > "For people living in England and ANYONE with an interest in England." > There's a list of groups here > http://www.england.news-admin.org/checkgroups.html I don't have any problem with the English creating their own hierarchy, but looking at the list of groups, there are quite a few which I can see no reason shouldn't be under the uk heirarchy, or is this more a political than geographical split ? england.consultants, england.jobs, england.media.tv, england.rec.pets etc.... What are so special about these groups, as to not include us Welsh, or the Scots and Irish ? The TV is the same, the job scene is the same etc... Cheers, Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message