From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Oct  6 21:40:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA09484
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 21:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA09473
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 21:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA18667; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 21:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Floppy Install in 2.1.0... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 06 Oct 1996 23:51:39 EDT."
             <XFMail.961007000013.durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> 
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 1996 21:40:11 -0700
Message-ID: <18660.844663211@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 2.1.0 's install apparently requires that the floppies have

2.1.0's floppy install was hosed, period.

> 1.1.5 worked fine, and I have to admit I haven't tried 2.2 .
> Just wondering if this fell through the cracks ?

You should try 2.1.5 - I applied some "blind" fixes (since I've no
longer the patience to try floppy installations and rely on external
testers :) which apparently even worked in fixing the floppy install.

					Jordan