From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Jun 22 18:55:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4219137C371 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id DAA56076 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 03:55:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA82576 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 03:55:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 03:55:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Change to msdosfs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Are there any objections to changing msdosfs to use the immutable flag to signify read-only operation, rather than the owner read/write bit? IMHO, this would be more true to the intended operation of the read-only bit. --- Marius Bendiksen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message