From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 16 21:39:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.mx.voyager.net (mail2.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBE537B406 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 21:39:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhagerty@voyager.net) Received: from thunderbird.voyager.net (net-216-93-124-123.hcv.com [216.93.124.123]) by mail2.mx.voyager.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5H4iHB98844 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:44:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010617003548.018431f0@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: mhagerty@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 00:44:22 -0400 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: Matthew Hagerty Subject: Re: Article: Network performance by OS In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010616142444.03952e48@pop.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings All, I just wanted to thank everyone for the responses! I did not mean to start such a debated thread. I'm glad to have the information about why FreeBSD place so poorly in these "idiot's" tests. I'll have to write SysAdmin a letter now and ask them why the hell they would publish such an article. I hope I'm not wasting my money subscribing to the magazine... Again, thank you all for the information! I have been using FreeBSD since Release-1.1 (I downloaded the binary install disks via AOL!!) and have used every version since. I have also tried Solaris, Linux, BSDI, Windows, and NetBSD, but I keep coming back to FreeBSD. One day I hope to be able to contribute my share as well. Thanks, Matthew At 02:42 PM 6/16/2001 -0400, Matthew Hagerty wrote: >Greetings, > >Here is a surprisingly unbiased article comparing OSes running hard core >network apps. The results are kind of disturbing, with FreeBSD (4.2) >coming in last against Linux (RH), Win2k, and Solaris (Intel). > >http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm > >The tests were performed against the TCP/IP implementation on these >platforms with different system calls. File systems tests (EXT2 for >Linux, UFS for FreeBSD and Solaris, and NTFS for Windows 2000) were >performed by creating writing, and reading 10,000 files in the same >directory, increasing the file size from 4K to 128K. Tests of various >network applications based on number of simultaneous connections, >process-based vs. thread-based, and sync vs. async connection handling >were also performed. > >Hope it might be helpful to you... > >Matthew > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message