Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:58:48 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Carp questions Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1810111354550.65597@mail.fig.ol.no> In-Reply-To: <12F8CE17-6E79-4AB5-B309-080F270F5F01@longcount.org> References: <12F8CE17-6E79-4AB5-B309-080F270F5F01@longcount.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 07:25-0400, Mark Saad wrote: > I am running into two carp questions I can’t easily find an answer > too . Before I go off and try to break stuff I figured i’de ask if > anyone has tried this and has any pointers . > > Issue one : adding more user defined bits to the custom carp Mac . > So this is not all that common but in some cases you can have two > pairs of carp servers with overlapping vhids that eventually cause > trouble with each other. Has anyone tried this ? I am ok with > random-ish mac’s like how crossbow does this on illumos . Maybe someone else can answer this. > Issue two: one way carp fail over . For example node a and b are > carp partners . Node a crashes node b takes over but there is no > automatic fail back when node a recovers . I can’t find a way to do > this in 11.x . I am stumped anyone have any built into magic for > this ? I run doubly DHCP servers using CARP, and I have net.inet.carp.preempt=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf on the master only. -- Trond. From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Oct 11 15:52:22 2018 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6B210BECBB for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BEE760EA for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:52:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 68D271CB48D for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:52:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Sponsored by: in commit messages Message-Id: <4ACC0E9B-0DC1-4316-BACB-9EF6958ADFBA@lassitu.de> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:52:17 +0200 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:52:22 -0000 Hi there, I just had another update to a port that I maintain committed. Thanks = for that! However, the commit message contains a Sponsored by line. I'm not = sponsored by that company, and neither is the upstream project, AFAICT. What is the significance of this line? The port update was mainly mechanical, although it included adding a = vuxml entry. At any rate, the submission contained a more specifc entry = for vuxml than what got committed. So I'm wondering what the sponsoring = actually entails. =46rom what I have observed over the years, Sponsored by has often = indicated significant contributions to important subsystems. Is this = impression misguided? Does it simply indicate that the committer working = on that commit on sponsored time, no matter the amount of work? Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1810111354550.65597>