Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:56:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907150954380.18866-100000@guru.phone.net> In-Reply-To: <1985.932056614@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: :->> Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are :->> allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide :->> libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this :->> anyway by the time 4.x is released). :-> :->I'd prefer not to bump it... John Birrell and I are already not :->entirely in agreement that the change required a version bump at :->all. It didn't change any interfaces. Which failure is better: An error that you don't have a recent enough version of the library, or one that the routine poll() can't be found at run time? <mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907150954380.18866-100000>