From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 4 00:40:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFE016A4CE; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 00:40:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D256B43D2F; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 00:40:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rodrigc@h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com) Received: from dibbler.crodrigues.org (h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.45.197]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004040408403901100c0ktge>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 08:40:39 +0000 Received: from dibbler.crodrigues.org (localhost.crodrigues.org [127.0.0.1]) i348evxi040119; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:40:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rodrigc@h00609772adf0.ne.client2.attbi.com) Received: (from rodrigc@localhost) by dibbler.crodrigues.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i348euvD040118; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:40:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rodrigc) Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:40:56 -0400 From: Craig Rodrigues To: Kirill Ponomarew , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040404084056.GA40107@crodrigues.org> References: <20040404023418.GA37816@crodrigues.org> <20040404025156.GA29009@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040404030247.GA38436@crodrigues.org> <20040404083056.GR75218@voodoo.oberon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040404083056.GR75218@voodoo.oberon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Problems with USE_AUTOMAKE_VER variable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 08:40:40 -0000 On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 10:30:56AM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > If I start to get approvals from all maintainers for USE_ICONV > changes, I'll be definitely insane. > > For such sweeping changes approval of portmgr is mostly enough. I'm not saying you need to get approval from the port maintainers, but it wouldn't kill you to send an e-mail to the port maintainers informing them. You could even script such an e-mail if you feel that it would take too many keystrokes for you to type. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc@crodrigues.org