From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 13 09:21:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04103 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 09:21:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat0069.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.188.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA04097 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 09:21:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA10014; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 13:20:42 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 13:20:41 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Vince Vielhaber cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Applixware was Re: Detailed info on Fail-safe cluster for Freebsd/unixes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > The only drawback that I see (which probably won't matter for most other > folks) is the lack of IMAP support in the mail client. For me it's a > minimum requirement for a mail application. But since that's just a small > piece of the app, XFMail isn't giving me any trouble, and the need for a > good, stable, non-emulated office suite I'll probably pre-order it. BTW, > from the linux URL, there are screenshots. It doesn't look that bad, > either. I was going to ask where these screenshots were, but went back and looked a little bit deeper and found them... Any chance of having a 'screenshots' link a little less buried? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message