From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 22 09:55:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF8216A47A;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (arm132.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
	[83.17.198.132])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8F144035;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:55:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 0DB7D51884; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (pjd.wheel.pl [10.0.1.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7ACB51853;
	Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:55:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:52:50 +0200
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>
Message-ID: <20060622095250.GD30568@garage.freebsd.pl>
References: <20060619131101.GD1130@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<44984A91.8040805@rogers.com>
	<20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit>
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc
X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on 
	mail.garage.freebsd.pl
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.0.4
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:55:34 -0000


--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:59:46AM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
+> ??? 2006-06-20?????? 21:36 +0200???Pawel Jakub Dawidek?????????
+> > The performance impact is big for large files, because in theory we ha=
ve
+> > to write the data twice.
+> > Yes, it eliminates need for SU, but there are reasons, that you still
+> > want to use SU, eg. for snapshots.
+>=20
+> Em...  IIRC SU and snapshots are independent, no?

Oops. Yes, you are right. bgfsck depends on SU, not snapshots.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEmmhyForvXbEpPzQRAohQAJ9cSI5QpRK5ghxwucJ91+fshMSIigCfeDjD
UHVHqWF9yKOf+SsGJViLP5c=
=nTBz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS--