From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 2 7:50:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E3537B405 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g32Fo3f34757; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200204021550.g32Fo3f34757@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Philippe CASIDY Subject: Re: ports/36630: Port tree inconsistency between cvsup servers Reply-To: Philippe CASIDY Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36630; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Philippe CASIDY To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/36630: Port tree inconsistency between cvsup servers Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:20:58 +0200 (CEST) On 1 Apr, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Thank you very much for your problem report. > It has the internal identification `ports/36630'. > The individual assigned to look at your > report is: freebsd-ports. > > You can access the state of your problem report at any time > via this link: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36630 > >>Category: ports >>Responsible: freebsd-ports >>Synopsis: Port tree inconsistency between cvsup servers >>Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 01 12:20:00 PST 2002 I have to admit that the problem comes from my side. I had a CVS sticky tag. on this port... I am sorry. You can close this PR. Phil. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message