From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 17:20:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2505816A4CE; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BBF43D1D; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cg4jI-0002Lo-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:20:24 +0100 Received: from [80.131.159.125] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cg4jI-0002DN-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:20:24 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:20:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1971132.UmuDyrQo8W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412191820.23664.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: gnn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dingo and PerForce X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:20:26 -0000 --nextPart1971132.UmuDyrQo8W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 19 December 2004 05:23, gnn@FreeBSD.org wrote: > For those who use PerForce and want to work on Dingo there is > now a dingo branch, named "dingo". The dingo branch contains > all of src, not just sys, as I suspect there are userland bits > we'll want to do. I know I'll be doing userland things. > Please make your own sub-branch off of dingo. For example, > here is mine (gnn_dingo): <...> > The main branch (dingo) is locked against changes and, more > importantly, accidental deletion. Let me know if there are any issues > with any of this. > > Oh, and the integration from vendor to dingo was done last Saturday > night around 23:00 JST. I am not all that familiar with perforce so I am wondering: What is the=20 benefit of having this branch if it will be tracking HEAD anyway, we can ju= st=20 branch off the normal vendor branch. Or do you plan to integrate parts back? I have 'mlaier_carp2' off the vendor branch. What will be the benefit if I= =20 move it to 'dingo' instead? =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1971132.UmuDyrQo8W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBxbhXXyyEoT62BG0RAufyAJ45BCwprf3VbLqZoeDK2Qbx4fa5EQCaA7Mm HBWeKMe4jvOY67UCLbmVeb8= =am+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1971132.UmuDyrQo8W--