Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:57:55 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT/CFR: NUMA policy branch Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokqgW%2BtSir=P%2B%2BfT3RxXDdcVjeJM8EyZjpfFU78Q7HYiQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BE4C0F16-31A4-4B27-972A-8C722E44266B@bsdimp.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=SnqXTF5m65haKqrVf699zinyXs%2BQdvR6V88CW7vooCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=y76JzK1RPdFy5bf%2B1x188emWq1%2BKe3xqDVJnDDyV=eA@mail.gmail.com> <BE4C0F16-31A4-4B27-972A-8C722E44266B@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Where's it hiding? All I have seen is the projects/numa branch. This is a subset of that. Adrian On Jun 1, 2015 8:38 AM, "Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > How does this work release to the branch that Jeff Roberson had for > numaizing > the VM system? Can any of that work be carried forward? > > Warner > > > > On May 31, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It's in a review, and I've addressed most of the feedback: > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559 > > > > I'd like to get more feedback before I commit this. I'm hoping to > > commit it next week so I can make a start on pushing numa awareness > > into KVA allocation and contigmalloc/busdma. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > -adrian > > > > > > On 12 May 2015 at 18:32, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm at the point now where I think this part is done and I'd like to > >> get it more formally reviewed and ready for commit into -HEAD. > >> > >> Here's the branch: > >> > >> > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...erikarn:local/adrian_numa_policy > >> > >> * added syscalls; > >> * added vm domain policy and iterators; > >> * per-process, per-thread and global system policy; > >> * added numactl - a tool to manipulate, fetch and start processes w/ > policies;; > >> * added manpages for everything above. > >> > >> It's working fine for a handful of people who have been testing it. > >> I'd like to get some more wider testing and reporting. > >> > >> I'd like to wrap this up in a formal phabricator review in the next > >> few days and kick start it along. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> -adrian > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokqgW%2BtSir=P%2B%2BfT3RxXDdcVjeJM8EyZjpfFU78Q7HYiQ>