Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:49:46 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, miwi@freebsd.org, araujo@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, "demon@FreeBSD.org" <demon@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <CADLo8398RAuqAUy0f3c8K_caf9QzEHB-FR2UZKLhm4vSmsr=2Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838RknV2bKnYgOVmL3nTWHbuFPF6aU-VtGLz76q7p286Sw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAOfEmZgqf_F-FuYE2t_5bhjcQB-roGYO8LCuX6yynh_oieBtww@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkvwf5MGLsTVfksO-vQoc4OK9x094SDUHXWkDWoedCO_g@mail.gmail.com> <20120524194135.GF40013@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <CADLo838RknV2bKnYgOVmL3nTWHbuFPF6aU-VtGLz76q7p286Sw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 24, 2012 8:43 PM, "Jason Helfman" <jgh@freebsd.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake: > >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval. > >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe > >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval. > > > >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve. > > > > > Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still > required for a timeout? Portmgr or the Security Officer (note not secteam) still should approve, strictly speaking. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo8398RAuqAUy0f3c8K_caf9QzEHB-FR2UZKLhm4vSmsr=2Q>