From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 04:59:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17959 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 04:59:15 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17953 ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 04:59:13 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA17388; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 12:58:40 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199507151158.MAA17388@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 12:58:40 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@FreeBSD.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199507150015.RAA15839@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 14, 95 05:15:07 pm Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 724 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Satoshi Asami who said > > I think if we can send PR's with category "ports" to both lists (-bugs > and -ports), that would be great. One thing, there aren't that many > PR's in category "ports", so there won't be that many duplicates. > Sorry, I'm not willing to do that. I know from past experience I'll get complaints about duplicates, even if there's only a few and I'm definitely not going to do anything to increase my mail load, it's unbearable already. Setting up a ports-bugs list seems the correct solution. -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home)